Peter Navarro: Jury seated in former Trump adviser’s criminal contempt of Congress trial

CNN
 — 

A jury was seated Tuesday in former White Home commerce adviser Peter Navarro’s felony contempt of Congress trial, marking the beginning of what’s anticipated to be a speedy trial for the one-time aide to former President Donald Trump.

Over the course of greater than seven hours, dozens of potential jurors have been peppered with questions by US District Choose Amit Mehta, who’s overseeing the case, in addition to prosecutors and an lawyer for Navarro.

The chosen jury is comprised of a various set of individuals in Washington, DC, together with authorities consultants, a contractor for NASA, somebody who works in psychological well being companies and some retirees. Lots of them mentioned they have been vaguely conscious of the Home January 6, 2021, committee’s work however that they didn’t assume it could impression their potential to serve objectively.

Either side are anticipated to offer their opening statements Wednesday morning, and the trial will doubtless be a fast one. Prosecutors mentioned they plan to name simply three witnesses, all of them being former committee staffers.

Navarro’s lawyer Stanley Woodward, in the meantime, mentioned he deliberate to name one witness: a particular agent with the FBI.

Navarro, like Trump ally Steve Bannon, faces prices over his lack of cooperation with subpoenas issued by the panel. Bannon was convicted final summer time on two counts of felony contempt in a case he’s interesting to the DC US Circuit Courtroom of Appeals.

Whereas the Home choose committee investigation resulted in early January, convictions within the felony instances arising from the defiance of its subpoenas stand to be a robust cudgel for congressional investigators sooner or later who’re coping with recalcitrant witnesses. It could additionally assist draw clearer traces round a former president’s energy to say privilege over aides dealing with calls for from Congress for testimony and paperwork.

Navarro is dealing with two counts of contempt stemming from his lack of compliance with the congressional subpoena’s request for each paperwork and testimony that carry a minimal of 1 month in jail. He has pleaded not responsible.

Navarro has already previewed the likelihood that, if convicted, he’d ask for larger courts weigh in on the authorized questions on privilege and congressional subpoena authority that his case presents.

“These are questions that can actually transfer up the chains – the appellate stage. And as I mentioned at the start, that is in all probability going to the Supreme Courtroom as a result of that is so essential,” Navarro instructed reporters final week. “You may’t have a Congress, a partisan Congress, that abuses the subpoena course of for the aim of punishing the social gathering that’s out of energy.”

The Justice Division, which is commonly within the place of defending an expansive view of presidential privilege, has walked a superb line, because it has sought to sq. positions it’s taken on immunity for presidential aides previously with the distinct particulars of Navarro’s case.

Throughout a number of hours of voir dire on Tuesday, Mehta pressed dozens of potential jurors about their information of Navarro’s case, the Home committee that investigated January 6, 2021, and whether or not they or somebody near them had ever been subpoenaed for information or testimony.

By midday, a few dozen individuals had already been stricken from the jury pool, together with a number of colourful figures whose solutions at occasions stunned even the choose.

The primary such individual was a girl who mentioned in one in all her solutions to the jury questions that she acknowledged Mehta. When the choose pressed her on how she knew who he was, she mentioned that he oversaw her fiancé’s felony case, which resulted in him being sentenced to 13 years in jail.

“That’s a primary,” Mehta quipped after the girl exited the courtroom, main the room to erupt into laughter.

At occasions, a person’s politics prevented them from qualifying to sit down on the jury within the case. One man described himself as “politically partisan” and was forthcoming about how he posts his views on-line.

After he left the courtroom, one in all Navarro’s attorneys instructed the choose that he had simply achieved a quick scan of one of many man’s social media accounts and that it was “rife” with anti-Trump posts. He, too, was stricken.

For his half, Navarro stood throughout a lot of Tuesday morning’s proceedings, watching intently as every potential juror was peppered with questions from his lawyer, prosecutors and Mehta.

Navarro’s lawyer, Stanley Woodward, instructed the choose that his shopper’s choice to face up was attributable to a “well being concern,” a message Mehta later relayed to all of the potential jurors.

Navarro, introduced into the Trump White Home to advise on commerce, was a distinguished face within the administration who earned a popularity for clashing with different prime Trump officers behind the scenes. He reportedly got here into the Trump orbit throughout the 2016 marketing campaign after Jared Kushner encountered a e book he had written expressing his onerous line views on China.

The Trump administration additionally put Navarro entrance and heart in its response to the Covid-19 pandemic. He spearheaded the trouble to streamline the medical provide chain, whereas additionally defending Trump’s views on controversial Covid remedies – particularly the drug hydroxychloroquine – that have been nicely outdoors the medical mainstream.

Navarro’s time within the White Home is a supply of continuous authorized troubles for the previous commerce adviser, troubles that aren’t restricted to the felony case.

He’s presently dealing with a civil lawsuit introduced by the Justice Division alleging he violated the Presidential Data Act by not turning over to the Nationwide Archives emails, mentioned to be authorities information, on his private e-mail account. He has appealed the ruling in opposition to him in that case.

Navarro’s felony trial will doubtless be a “brief” one, Mehta mentioned at a pretrial convention final week, and prosecutors have predicted that their case in chief will take now not than a day.

With the choose discovering that Trump didn’t make a proper invocation of privilege, Navarro will probably be severely restricted within the defenses he can put in entrance of the jury. Prosecutors have argued that the jury want solely to seek out that his failure to adjust to the subpoenas was deliberate and intentional.

When the Home committee subpoenaed Navarro final 12 months, it pointed to the account in Navarro’s post-White Home memoir concerning the effort to overturn Trump’s electoral loss and different public remarks he made concerning the plans aimed on the 2020 outcomes. Navarro turned over no paperwork, nor did he present as much as sit for the demanded testimony.

Prosecutors are anticipated to placed on the stand a handful of attorneys who labored for the previous committee, who’re prone to testify concerning the panel’s protocols and their interactions with Navarro over the subpoenas.

Navarro’s trial is going down a number of months not on time, after the choose concluded in January shortly earlier than the unique trial date that he wanted to offer extra consideration to Navarro’s declare that Trump asserted privilege that prevented his compliance with the subpoena and whether or not a jury might think about proof of such a declare. After months of authorized briefings, that consideration got here to a head final week with a listening to on what proof Navarro needed to show a proper assertion of privilege or testimonial immunity had been made.

Throughout the practically three-hour listening to final Monday, Navarro testified that Trump made it recognized to him that he didn’t need his former aide to cooperate with the Home choose committee. He mentioned there was “no query … none,” that Trump had invoked privilege within the matter.

Mehta concluding that Navarro had not carried his burden in proving that Trump had formally asserted a privilege or a testimonial immunity that may have allowed his former aide to not even seem to reply the committee’s questions. Mehta described Navarro’s testimony of a February 20, 2022, name with Trump, the place Trump supposedly confirmed that privilege had been asserted, as “nondescript” and missing intimately.

In handing down his ruling, the choose weighed in on what he described as an “open” authorized query: whether or not a president – or somebody approved to say privilege on a president’s behalf – wanted to personally assert the privilege for that assertion to be legitimate. Mehta concluded that such a private assertion was crucial.

“The privilege can’t be validly asserted by mere acquiescence,” Mehta mentioned.

Navarro, if convicted, might tee up the privilege concern as one larger courts ought to overview. Bannon has an attraction underway of his conviction that’s targeted on how he was not allowed to place ahead as a protection at trial the recommendation of counsel he obtained earlier than not complying with a subpoena from the Home January 6 committee.

Prosecutions of ex-presidential aides for his or her lack of compliance with congressional probes have been a uncommon endeavor for the Justice Division. It declined to prosecute former Trump White Home officers Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino, who have been additionally subpoenaed by the committee and referred by the Home to the Justice Division for contempt. Their dealings with the committee differed from Navarro’s and Bannon’s in essential methods, with Meadows producing a whole bunch of paperwork earlier than withdrawing his cooperation with the probe.

The prices of even combating such felony instances – not to mention serving the punishment of a conviction – will doubtless weigh on future witnesses when confronting congressional subpoenas with which they aren’t in any other case inclined to conform.

Navarro instructed reporters outdoors the courthouse final week that his authorized payments, together with appeals of the case, would exceed $1 million.

“Do I appear like a wealthy man? This is similar go well with I wore in 2017 going into the White Home,” he mentioned.

This headline and story have been up to date with further developments.