/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/CWKSWCAA55INNKARHVY2SASSCY.jpg "Russian missiles target Ukrainian energy facilities before winter – Kyiv")
Final June, simply months after the discharge of ChatGPT from OpenAI, a few New York Metropolis attorneys infamously used the instrument to put in writing a really poor transient. The AI cited pretend circumstances, resulting in an uproar, an offended decide and two very embarrassed attorneys. It was proof that whereas bots like ChatGPT will be useful, you actually should examine their work rigorously, particularly in a authorized context.
The case didn’t escape the parents at LexisNexis, a authorized software program firm that provides tooling to assist attorneys discover the best case legislation to make their authorized arguments. The corporate sees the potential of AI in serving to cut back a lot of the mundane authorized work that each lawyer undertakes, however it additionally acknowledges these very actual points because it begins its generative AI journey.
Jeff Reihl, chief expertise officer at LexisNexis, understands the worth of AI. In truth, his firm has been constructing the expertise into its platform for a while now. However with the ability to add ChatGPT-like performance to its authorized toolbox would assist attorneys work extra effectively: serving to with transient writing and discovering citations quicker.
“We as a company have been working with AI applied sciences for a variety of years. I feel what is absolutely, actually totally different now since ChatGPT got here out in November, is the chance to generate textual content and the conversational points that include this expertise,” Reihl advised TechCrunch+.
